One of the problems with copyrighted software is that if the copyright holder disappears no one can legally take over maintenance of the software - potentially leaving the paying customers with unusable data. One of the competitive advantages that open source software [more precisely free software as in GNU, BSD license] has, particularly for small firms, is that it provides the customer with a guaranteee that they can take over maintenance of the software. The abandonment problem is a real one.
In a different context it is in the news today that a complex series of events resulted in the disappearance of 3000 websites, including in some cases, years of data. Even if the data is eventually returned, they will return to a different web address, meaning that any readership accumulated at the old address will be lost. A similar event took place when CNET purchased mp3.com and dumped years of accumulated music. The bottom line is - for the individual protection of "intellectual property" does not take place through copyright - it takes place by making sure that you keep copies of your own data and that you own your own web addresses.
An
article in the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank magazine, The Region by Douglas Clement based on Boldrin & Levine's analysis of intellectual property. Reprinted in
Reason Online, also see the
Slashdot thread on our book and
on the Reason article, and the
discussion
at the Library of Economics and Liberty.
A
lawyers view of intellectual property. Including some interesting observations about industries that do not have recourse to intellectual "property."
The
PPPP:
from
stupidity to criminal insanity. What
next? A law authorizing the
RIAAto assassinate anyone they suspect of "piracy?"