logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


current posts | more recent posts

The Abandonment Problem

One of the problems with copyrighted software is that if the copyright holder disappears no one can legally take over maintenance of the software - potentially leaving the paying customers with unusable data. One of the competitive advantages that open source software [more precisely free software as in GNU, BSD license] has, particularly for small firms, is that it provides the customer with a guaranteee that they can take over maintenance of the software. The abandonment problem is a real one.

In a different context it is in the news today that a complex series of events resulted in the disappearance of 3000 websites, including in some cases, years of data. Even if the data is eventually returned, they will return to a different web address, meaning that any readership accumulated at the old address will be lost. A similar event took place when CNET purchased mp3.com and dumped years of accumulated music. The bottom line is - for the individual protection of "intellectual property" does not take place through copyright - it takes place by making sure that you keep copies of your own data and that you own your own web addresses.

Recent Analysis of Intellectual Property Wrongs

Why copyright extension is a bad idea, and why economic growth reduces the social benefits of patents

Was Napster Right?

An article in the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank magazine, The Region by Douglas Clement based on Boldrin & Levine's analysis of intellectual property. Reprinted in Reason Online, also see the Slashdot thread on our book and on the Reason article, and the discussion at the Library of Economics and Liberty.

Is Intellectual Property Property?

A lawyers view of intellectual property. Including some interesting observations about industries that do not have recourse to intellectual "property."

Your Government at Work

The PPPP: from stupidity to criminal insanity. What next? A law authorizing the RIAAto assassinate anyone they suspect of "piracy?"

Review of The Case Against Intellectual Property

The Case Against Intellectual Property at economicprincipals.com

Views of Piracy

An author's view: Just the facts ma'am.

A performer's view: "when someone writes and tells me they came to my show because they'd downloaded a song and gotten curious, I am thrilled!"

A producer's view There are pirates out there...

current posts | more recent posts


   

Most Recent Comments

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

How To Buy Tramadol Online Legally? 555

How To Buy Tramadol Online Legally? 555

How To Buy Tramadol Online Legally? 555

How To Buy Tramadol Online Legally? 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

Dr. Who? 555

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer 555

Dr. Who? 555

Dr. Who? 555

Dr. Who? 555

How To Buy Tramadol Online Legally? 555