A London appeals court has awarded the lead singer of
Procol Harum sole royalty rights to the 1967 hit "A Whiter Shade of Pale"
link here. It revoked an earlier ruling awarding 40 percent of the royalties to the group's organist for composing the organ theme, on the grounds that his claim was made too late. He had deferred making it, because he feared it would end his work with the group. It may be appealed to the House of Lords.
Whoever writes these little stories must have it in for the legal and intellectual property professions. Maybe we should retitle this category intellectual property law as a joke. If the plaintiff's claim was legitimate once upon a time and the copyright still applies, why shouldn't his claim be legitimate now?